I listened to Rush Limbaugh the other day, I'm not sure why and he sent me into a rage like none other. First off, Rush is simply an idiot. The sound of his voice makes my bowels want to move. He is an absolute moron with a national platform to bash the democrats. He is a "good ole' republican boy" who has nothing better to do other than to bash the president and collect a big pay check. Shit, anybody could do that! I am not a huge fan of President Obama, however I did vote for him because I could not consciously vote for that senile old fart John McCain and his Bimbrod Sarah Palin. As I listened to Limp Baugh slice and dice the president, I thought about about how cut throat the republicans are to get the white house back. When the topic of Libya first came up a few weeks ago, the republicans complained that President Obama was not moving fast enough and that he was lame in his lack of action. When Obama took the bull by the horns and included our military in the NATO forces in Libya, the republicans bashed him saying he was moving to quickly. What in the ever living hell do they want him to do?
Speaker of the House Republican John Boehner, not to be confused with "when I saw her naked I got a Boehner", bashed the president on all the national news networks complaining that Obama did not consult Congress on his actions in Libya and that there was no direct plan on how it would unfold. Shit, this coming from a republican! Their last president, the moron "W" got us involved in Irag with absolutely no plan and no defined end to the mission. As far as the American public knew, we went in to get Sadam Hussien. In fact, we are still bogged down in camel shit in Iraq with no end in sight even though we completed our alleged mission. How dare these nitwits call out the president for his actions when they are the worst war mongers on the planet. Thanks to their boy "W", we are in two bogus wars and our economy is in the shitter. Speaker Boehner also stated in a letter to President Obama that "A United Nations Security Council resolution does not substitute for a U.S. political and military strategy. You have stated that Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi must go, consistent with U.S. policy goals. But the U.N. resolution the U.S. helped develop and signed onto makes clear that regime change is not part of this mission. In light of this contradiction, is it an acceptable outcome for Qadhafi to remain in power after the military effort concludes in Libya? If not, how will he be removed from power? Why would the U.S. commit American resources to enforcing a U.N. resolution that is inconsistent with our stated policy goals and national interests?"
I have to ask you, since when do we give a rats ass about the United Nations Security Council and their policies? They are a bunch of mealy worms crawling around the world on their bellies. If I was the president, I would throw their sorry asses right out of New York! They are like tits on a bull, useless! "W" and his old man didn't care about what the UN thought. Why should Barack! To sum all of this krap up, I say, "You Go Barack". Bomb Qadhafi and his gang of thugs back into the stone age. As for Speaker of the House Boehner, shove that big gavel up your ass and shut the hell up!
Well said, BRAVO!!!!
ReplyDeleteRepublicans are the spawn of satan
ReplyDelete